4.1 Article

Association of genetic variation in IL28B with hepatitis C treatment-induced viral clearance in the Chinese Han population

期刊

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 141-147

出版社

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP1703

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Nature Science Grants [30471523, 30671839]
  2. State Major Science and Technology Special Projects [2008ZX10005-009]
  3. National High Science and Technology Grant [2006AA02A411]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genome-wide association studies have recently shown that the rs12979860 polymorphism in IL2813 is associated with the response to chronic hepatitis C treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether rs12979860 could be used as a predictive marker for end-of-treatment response (ETA) or sustained virological response (SVR) in the Chinese Han population. Methods: The rs12979860 genotype was detected in 259 individuals infected with HCV by DNA sequencing. Among them, 120 patients were administered complete pegylated interferon-a and ribavirin combination therapy and 92 patients were followed for 24 weeks after the cessation of treatment and were divided into different groups according to outcomes of treatment. Results: The rs12979860 genotype CC was the primary genotype (87.64%, 227/259) and genotype TT was found in only one individual within this cohort. The patients with the rs12979860 genotype CC had higher rates of ETR (P=0.0044) and SVR (P=0.0046) than the patients with N-CC (CT or TT). In multivariate analyses, the rs12979860 genotype CC was associated with a substantial difference in rates of achieving ETR (odds ratio [OR] 8.983, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.173-37.145; P=0.0024) and SVR (OR 24.298, 95% CI 2.27-259.90; P=0.0083). Conclusions: This study demonstrated for the first time that the rs12979860 variation in IL28B could be a predictor of ETA and SVR in Chinese Han patients infected with HCV. The high frequency of the rs12979860 genotype CC might explain why the SVR rate is higher than that of the average global population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据