4.7 Article

Passively transferred M2e-specific monoclonal antibody reduces influenza A virus transmission in mice

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 244-254

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2018.08.017

关键词

Influenza A virus; Mouse transmission model; M2 ectodomain; Broadly protecting antibody

资金

  1. EC-FP7 ITN UniVacFlu project
  2. Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [G043515N]
  3. People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2013-2018) under REA [607609]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza represents a global public health threat. Currently available influenza vaccines are effective against strain-matched influenza A and B viruses but do not protect against novel pandemic viruses. Vaccine candidates that target conserved B or T cell epitopes of influenza viruses could circumvent this shortcoming. The conserved extracellular domain of matrix protein 2 (M2e) of influenza A is an example of such a broadly protective vaccine candidate. Protection by M2e-based vaccine candidates largely depends on M2e-specific IgG antibodies. Here we show that the M2e-specific IgG2a monoclonal antibody 65 (MAb 65) can reduce influenza A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) and A/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) virus plaque formation. This effect was not observed with other influenza A virus strains tested. We further show that passive transfer of MAb 65 to mice can reduce viral loads in the upper and lower airways, which results in reduced transmission of A/Udorn/72 and A/Hong Kong/68 viruses to cohoused, unimmunized contact mice. Virus restriction by passively transferred Mab 65 was significantly less pronounced in Fcgr1(-/-) Fcgr3(-/-) mutant mice compared with wild type controls, suggesting that in vivo protection provided by MAb 65 depends on Fc gamma receptor-mediated antibody effector mechanisms. We conclude that M2e-based antibody immune therapy has the potential to diminish influenza A virus replication in the immunized host as well as in exposed naive contacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据