4.7 Article

Evaluation of inhaled cidofovir as postexposure prophylactic in an aerosol rabbitpox model

期刊

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 204-208

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2011.11.013

关键词

Poxvirus; Rabbitpox; Smallpox treatment; Aerosol; Cidofovir

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  2. National Institute of Health
  3. NIH/NCRR [P51 RR000164]
  4. Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272200900015C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smallpox is considered a biological threat based upon the possibility of deliberate reintroduction into the population, creating an urgent need for effective antivirals. The antiviral drug cidofovir (Cr) has shown to be effective against poxviruses, although route-specific nephrotoxicity has hampered its development for emergency post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). In this study, we use a micronized dry powder formulation of pharmaceutical-grade Cr (NanoFOVIRTM; Nf) to treat rabbits exposed to aerosolized rabbitpox virus (RPXV) to further evaluate the effectiveness of direct drug delivery to the lung. Naive rabbits were infected with RPXV by aerosol; three subsets received aerosolized Nf at 0.5, 1.0 or 1.75 mg/kg daily for 3 days post-exposure, positive and negative control groups received intravenous (IV) Cr treatments and no treatment, respectively. Nf groups showed an antiviral-dose associated survival of 50% (0.5 mg/kg), 80% (1.0 mg/kg) and 100%(1.75 mg/kg). All animals (100%) from the IV-Cr treatment group and none (0%) from the untreated controls survived. Nf (1.75) protected rabbits from RPX at approximately 10% of the equivalent IV-Cr dose. A dose-related effect was observed in clinical development of RPX disease in Nf groups. Significant reduction of RPX-induced pathological changes was observed in Nf (1.75) and IV-Cr groups. Results suggest that Nf may be a viable antiviral for emergency post-exposure prophylaxis and should be evaluated in other models of poxviral disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据