4.7 Article

Nrf2-Mediated Heme Oxygenase-1 Upregulation as Adaptive Survival Response to Glucose Deprivation-Induced Apoptosis in HepG2 Cells

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1639-1648

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3226

关键词

-

资金

  1. Innovative Drug Research Center [R11-2007-107-01002-0]
  2. National Research Foundation [R31-008-000-10103-0]
  3. National Research Foundation, the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Republic of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induction of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) represents an important cellular adaptive survival response to oxidative stress and other toxic insults. In the present study, HepG2 cells grown in glucose-free media underwent apoptotic cell death, but they exhibited elevated expression of HO-1 before apoptosis manifested. Treatment of HepG2 cells with SnCl2, a HO-1 inducer, rescued these cells from glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis, while inhibition of the HO activity with zinc protoporphyrin IX exacerbated apoptosis under the same condition. HepG2 cells transfected with a dominant negative Nrf2 were more vulnerable to glucose deprivation-induced apoptosis compared to cells transfected with empty vector alone. To confirm the involvement of Nrf2 in the induction of HO-1 caused by glucose deprivation, we used embryonic fibroblasts prepared from nrf2(-/-), nrf2(+/-), and nrf2(+/+) embryos. Compared to the wild-type and the nrf2(+/-) embryonic fibroblasts, nrf2(-/-) cells were less prone to induce HO-1 expression upon glucose deprivation. Exposure of HepG2 cells to glucose-deprived media resulted in an elevated accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Pretreatment with N-acetylcysteine prevented the glucose deprivation-induced ROS accumulation and also the HO-1 expression. In conclusion, the Nrf2-mediated HO-1 upregulation upon glucose deprivation is mediated by ROS in HepG2 cells, and responsible for the adaptive survival response. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 1639-1648.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据