4.7 Article

Pharmacological Properties of NAI-603, a Well-Tolerated Semisynthetic Derivative of Ramoplanin

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 1922-1929

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01620-13

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NAI-603 is a ramoplanin derivative designed to overcome the tolerability issues of the parent drug as a systemic agent. NAI-603 is highly active against aerobic and anaerobic Gram-positive bacteria, with MICs ranging from 0.008 to 8 mu g/ml. MICs were not significantly affected by pH (range, 6 to 8), by inoculum up to 108 CFU/ml, or by addition of 50% human serum. Against staphylococci and enterococci, NAI-603 was rapidly bactericidal, with minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC)/MIC ratios never exceeding 4. The frequency of spontaneous resistance was low at 2x to 4x MIC (<= 1 x 10(-6) to <= 1 x 10(-8)) and below the detection limit (about <= 1 x 10(-9)) at 8x MIC. Serial subcultures at 0.5x MIC yielded at most an 8-fold increase in MICs. In a systemic infection induced by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the 50% effective dose (ED50) of intravenous (i.v.) NAI-603 was 0.4 mg/kg, lower than that of oral (p.o.) linezolid (1.4 mg/kg) and subcutaneous (s.c.) teicoplanin (1.4 mg/kg) or vancomycin (0.6 mg/kg). In neutropenic mice infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), the ED(50)s for NAI-603 were 1.1 to 1.6 mg/kg i.v., compared to 0.5 mg/kg i.v. of ramoplanin. The bactericidal activity was confirmed in vivo in the rat granuloma pouch model induced by MRSA, where NAI-603, at 40 mg/kg i.v., induced about a 2- to 3-log(10)-reduction in viable bacteria in the exudates, which persisted for more than 72 h. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of NAI-603 and ramoplanin at 20 mg/ kg show similar half-lives (3.27 and 3.80 h, respectively) with the maximum concentration (C-max) markedly higher for NAI-603 (207 mu g/ml versus 79 mu g/ml). The favorable pharmacological profile of NAI-603, coupled with the absence of local tolerability issues, supports further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据