4.7 Article

Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of GSK1322322 in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 11, 页码 6518-6527

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.03360-14

关键词

-

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Theravance
  3. Innocoll
  4. Medicines Company
  5. eStudySite
  6. Cempra Pharmaceuticals
  7. PRA International
  8. Furiex Pharmaceuticals
  9. Inimex Pharmaceuticals
  10. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories
  11. Cubist Pharmaceuticals
  12. Cerexa/Forest Laboratories
  13. AstraZeneca
  14. Pfizer
  15. Merck
  16. Trius Therapeutics
  17. Contrafect
  18. Astellas Pharma
  19. Polymedix
  20. Rib-x Pharmaceuticals, Seachaid Pharmaceuticals
  21. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
  22. Durata Therapeutics
  23. Achaogen
  24. Gilead Sciences
  25. Cempra
  26. Nabriva Therapeutics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GSK1322322 represents a new class of antibiotics that targets an essential bacterial enzyme required for protein maturation, peptide deformylase. This multicenter, randomized, phase IIa study compared the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of GSK1322322 at 1,500 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) with that of linezolid at 600 mg b.i.d. in patients suspected of having Gram-positive acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). The primary endpoint was assessment of the safety of GSK1322322, and a key secondary endpoint was the number of subjects with a >= 20% decrease in lesion area from the baseline at 48 and 72 h after treatment initiation. GSK1322322 administration was associated with mild-to-moderate drug-related adverse events, most commonly, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and headache. Adverse events (86% versus 74%) and withdrawals (28% versus 11%) were more frequent in the GSK1322322-treated group. Treatment with GSK1322322 and linezolid was associated with >= 20% decreases from the baseline in the lesion area in 73% (36/49) and 92% (24/26) of the patients, respectively, at the 48-h assessment and in 96% (44/46) and 100% (25/25) of the patients, respectively, at the 72-h assessment. Reductions in exudate/pus, pain, and skin infection scores were comparable between the GSK1322322 and linezolid treatments. The clinical success rates within the intent-to-treat population and the per-protocol population that completed this study were 67 and 91%, respectively, in the GSK1322322-treated group and 89 and 100%, respectively, in the linezolid-treated group. These results will be used to guide dose selection in future studies with GSK1322322 to optimize its tolerability and efficacy in patients with ABSSSIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据