4.7 Article

Relationship between Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Exposure and Drug Resistance Amplification in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 57, 期 9, 页码 4134-4138

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00461-13

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cubist Pharmaceuticals Inc., Lexington, MA
  2. Achaogen
  3. Astellas
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Basilea Pharmaceutica
  6. Bayer HealthCare
  7. Bristol-Meyers Squibb
  8. Cempra Pharmaceuticals
  9. Cerexa
  10. Cubist Pharmaceuticals
  11. Durata Pharmaceuticals
  12. Fedora Pharmaceuticals
  13. Forest Research Institute
  14. Furiex Pharmaceuticals
  15. GlaxoSmithKline
  16. Meiji Seika Pharma
  17. Nabriva Therapeutics
  18. Nimbus
  19. Pfizer
  20. PolyMedix
  21. Rib-X
  22. Roche Bioscience
  23. Rempex Pharmaceuticals
  24. Rib-X Pharmaceuticals
  25. Rock Therapeutics
  26. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals
  27. Medicines Company
  28. American Proficiency Institute (API)
  29. Anacor
  30. Bayer
  31. Basilea Pharmaceuticals
  32. Cempra/Forest
  33. Contrafect
  34. Cubist
  35. Daiichi
  36. Dipexium
  37. Durata
  38. Enanta
  39. Fedora
  40. Furiex
  41. Johnson & Johnson (Ortho McNeil)
  42. LegoChem Biosciences Inc.
  43. Meiji Seika Kaisha
  44. Merck
  45. Nabriva
  46. Novartis
  47. Pfizer (Wyeth)
  48. Pfizer (Wyeth), Rempex
  49. Seachaid
  50. Shionogi
  51. Theravance
  52. ThermoFisher

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an era of rapidly emerging antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, it is critical to understand the importance of the relationships among drug exposure, duration of therapy, and selection of drug resistance. Herein we describe the results of studies designed to determine the ceftolozane-tazobactam exposure necessary to prevent the amplification of drug-resistant bacterial subpopulations in a hollow-fiber infection model. The challenge isolate was a CTX-M-15-producing Escherichia coli isolate genetically engineered to transcribe a moderate level of bla(CTX-M-15). This organism's bla(CTX-M-15) transcription level was confirmed by relative quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), beta-lactamase hydrolytic assays, and a ceftolozane MIC value of 16 mg/liter. In these studies, the experimental duration (10 days), ceftolozane-tazobactam dose ratio (2: 1), and dosing interval (every 8 h) were selected to approximate those expected to be used clinically. The ceftolozane-tazobactam doses studied ranged from 125-62.5 to 1,500-750 mg. Negative-and positive-control arms included no treatment and piperacillin-tazobactam at 4.5 g every 6 h, respectively. An inverted-U-shaped function best described the relationship between bacterial drug resistance amplification and drug exposure. The least-and most-intensive ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens, i.e., 125-62.5, 750-375, 1,000-500, and 1,500-750 mg, did not amplify drug resistance, while drug resistance amplification was observed with intermediate-intensity dosing regimens (250-125 and 500-250 mg). For the intermediate-intensity ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens, the drug-resistant subpopulation became the dominant population by days 4 to 6. The more-intensive ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens (750-375, 1,000-500, and 1,500-750 mg) not only prevented drug resistance amplification but also virtually sterilized the model system. These data support the selection of ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing regimens that minimize the potential for on-therapy drug resistance amplification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据