4.7 Article

Activation of the Unfolded Protein Response by 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Inhibits Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Replication and Gene Expression

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 56, 期 11, 页码 5794-5803

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01126-12

关键词

-

资金

  1. Public Health Service from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [CA-136387, CA-037109]
  2. SCCC Developmental Award
  3. Pap Corps

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lytic replication of the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) is essential for the maintenance of both the infected state and characteristic angiogenic phenotype of Kaposi's sarcoma and thus represents a desirable therapeutic target. During the peak of herpesvirus lytic replication, viral glycoproteins are mass produced in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Normally, this leads to ER stress which, through an unfolded protein response (UPR), triggers phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2 alpha), resulting in inhibition of protein synthesis to maintain ER and cellular homeostasis. However, in order to replicate, herpesviruses have acquired the ability to prevent eIF2 alpha phosphorylation. Here we show that clinically achievable nontoxic doses of the glucose analog 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) stimulate ER stress, thereby shutting down eIF2 alpha and inhibiting KSHV and murine herpesvirus 68 replication and KSHV reactivation from latency. Viral cascade genes that are involved in reactivation, including the master transactivator (RTA) gene, glycoprotein B, K8.1, and angiogenesis-regulating genes are markedly decreased with 2-DG treatment. Overall, our data suggest that activation of UPR by 2-DG elicits an early antiviral response via eIF2 alpha inactivation, which impairs protein synthesis required to drive viral replication and oncogenesis. Thus, induction of ER stress by 2-DG provides a new antiherpesviral strategy that may be applicable to other viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据