4.7 Article

The Antibacterial Activity of Ga3+ Is Influenced by Ligand Complexation as Well as the Bacterial Carbon Source

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 55, 期 12, 页码 5568-5580

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00386-11

关键词

-

资金

  1. The Curth Nilsson Foundation for Scientific Research
  2. Umea University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gallium ions have previously been shown to exhibit antibacterial and antibiofilm properties. In this study, we report differential bactericidal activities of two gallium complexes, gallium desferrioxamine B (Ga-DFOB) and gallium citrate (Ga-Cit). Modeling of gallium speciation in growth medium showed that DFOB and citrate both can prevent precipitation of Ga(OH)(3), but some precipitation can occur above pH 7 with citrate. Despite this, Ga-Cit 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90) were lower than those of Ga-DFOB for clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and several reference strains of other bacterial species. Treatment with Ga compounds mitigated damage inflicted on murine J774 macrophage-like cells infected with P. aeruginosa PAO1. Again, Ga-Cit showed more potent mitigation than did Ga-DFOB. Ga was also taken up more efficiently by P. aeruginosa in the form of Ga-Cit than in the form of Ga-DFOB. Neither Ga-Cit nor Ga-DFOB was toxic to several human cell lines tested, and no proinflammatory activity was detected in human lung epithelial cells after exposure in vitro. Metabolomic analysis was used to delineate the effects of Ga-Cit on the bacterial cell. Exposure to Ga resulted in lower concentrations of glutamate, a key metabolite for P. aeruginosa, and of many amino acids, indicating that Ga affects various biosynthesis pathways. An altered protein expression profile in the presence of Ga-Cit suggested that some compensatory mechanisms were activated in the bacterium. Furthermore, the antibacterial effect of Ga was shown to vary depending on the carbon source, which has importance in the context of medical applications of gallium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据