4.7 Article

GES Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates in Belgium

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 11, 页码 4872-4878

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00871-10

关键词

-

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. Ministere de l'Education Nationale et de la Recherche [UPRES-EA3539]
  3. Universite Paris XI, Paris
  4. Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, France
  5. European Community [HEALTH-F3-2008-223031, HEALTH-2009-2.3.1.3, 241742]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During a PCR-based surveillance study of beta-lactam resistance, 125 multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter baumannii isolates were obtained from 18 hospitals in Belgium from January 2008 to December 2009. Nine GES-positive A. baumannii isolates were detected at 6 Belgian hospitals. DNA sequencing of the bla(GES) genes identified GES-11, GES-12, and a novel variant GES-14, which differs from GES-11 by a single amino acid substitution (Gly170Ser). All index isolates were travel associated and originated from patients transferred from Turkey (n = 2), Egypt (n = 2), and Palestinian territories (Gaza) (n = 2). A nosocomial outbreak involving three additional patients occurred in a burn unit at a single hospital. No clonal relatedness could be established between the 6 index isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis. Three different alleles (the plasmid-located bla(GES-11) and bla(GES-12) and a likely chromosomally located novel variant bla(GES-14)) were detected as part of a class 1 integron, also including the aac6'Ib and dfrA7 genes. Restriction analysis of plasmids suggests a common origin for the plasmids bearing bla(GES-11) and bla(GES-12). Cloning of the bla(GES) genes in Escherichia coli identified GES-14 as hydrolyzing imipenem, while GES-12 showed the highest specific activity against ceftazidime. This report highlights the emergence of various bla(GES-like) genes, especially those conferring carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii and its importation in Western Europe from Middle Eastern countries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据