4.7 Article

Identification of Optimal Renal Dosage Adjustments for Traditional and Extended-Infusion Piperacillin-Tazobactam Dosing Regimens in Hospitalized Patients

期刊

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 54, 期 1, 页码 460-465

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00296-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. American College of Clinical Pharmacy Infectious Diseases Minisabbatical Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the effect of various levels of renal impairment on the probability of achieving free drug concentrations that exceed the MIC for 50% of the dosing interval (50% fT > MIC) for traditional and extended-infusion piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) dosing strategies. It also identified optimal renal dosage adjustments for traditional and extended-infusion dosing schemes that yielded probability of target attainment (PTA) and exposure profiles that were isometric to those of the parent regimens. Data from 105 patients were analyzed using the population pharmacokinetic modeling program BigNPAG. To assess the effect of creatinine clearance (CLCR) on overall clearance, TZP clearance was made proportional to the estimated CLCR. A Monte Carlo simulation (9,999 subjects) was performed for the traditional dosing scheme (4.5 g infused during 30 min every 6 h) and the extended-infusion TZP dosing scheme (3.375 g infused during 4 h every 8 h). The fraction of simulated subjects who achieved 50% fT > MIC was calculated for the range of piperacillin MICs from 0.25 to 32 mg/liter and stratified by CLCR. The traditional TZP regimen displayed the greatest variability in PTA across MIC values, especially for MIC values exceeding 4 mg/liter, when stratified by CLCR. In contrast, the PTA for the extended-infusion TZP regimen exceeded >= 80% for MIC values of <= 8 mg/liter across all CLCR strata. All regimens were associated with suboptimal PTA for MIC values of >= 32 mg/liter irrespective of the CLCR. The CLCR adjustments for traditional and extended-infusion TZP dosing regimens should be considered at a CLCR of <= 20 ml/min.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据