4.0 Article

Cyanobacterial diversity for an anthropogenic impact assessment in the Sor Rondane Mountains area, Antarctica

期刊

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 229-242

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102011000824

关键词

Antarctic; biodiversity; Dronning Maud Land; Princess Elisabeth Station; Utsteinen Nunatak; 16S rRNA

资金

  1. BelSPO
  2. Foundation Alfonso Martin Escudero

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recently inaugurated Belgian Princess Elisabeth Station has been built in the Sor Rondane Mountains (Dronning Maud Land). The construction site is situated close to the Utsteinen Nunatak (71 degrees 57'S, 23 degrees 20'E), on a granite ridge. Prior to the survey and construction activities, the site had been subject to limited or no direct human impacts. Therefore, a biological inventory has been started for future evaluations of human impacts in the area. This study presents the cyanobacterial diversity of ten samples from the Utsteinen ridge, the Utsteinen Nunatak in the vicinity of the station's site and the more distant Ketelersbreen Dry Valley. All samples were taken before the station was built and were studied by light microscopy and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Two strains were also isolated. Two different phenol-based extraction methods, with and without detergent-based steps, were tested to improve the quality of molecular detection from these environmental samples. We observed high cyanobacterial diversity (ten morphotypes and 13 operational taxonomic units) in comparison to other Antarctic terrestrial locations and a widespread distribution pattern within the Sor Rondane Mountains area. This might reflect the habitat similarities and/or the easy local dispersal capabilities of microorganisms within the region. The high diversity and proportion of potential endemic (46%) operational taxonomic units, of which 23% were newly described, suggest that this area could have acted as a biological refuge during past glaciations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据