4.5 Review Book Chapter

Inducible Innate Resistance of Lung Epithelium to Infection

期刊

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 413-435

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135909

关键词

innate immunity; antimicrobial; microbial killing; pneumonia

资金

  1. NIH [RR02419, AI061555, U54 AI057156, HL72984, HL094848, AI82226]
  2. Texas A&M Health Science Center
  3. Hamill Foundation
  4. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [08G0]
  5. George and Barbara Bush Endowment for Innovative Cancer Research
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016086] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR002419] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL072984, R21HL094848] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [U01AI082226, U54AI057156, R21AI061555] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most studies of innate immunity have focused on leukocytes such as neutrophils, macrophages, and natural killer cells. However, epithelial cells play key roles in innate defenses that include providing a mechanical barrier to microbial entry, signaling to leukocytes, and directly killing pathogens. Importantly, all these defenses are highly inducible in response to the sensing of microbial and host products. In healthy lungs, the level of innate immune epithelial function is low at baseline. This is indicated by low levels of spontaneous microbial killing and cytokine release, reflecting low constitutive stimulation in the nearly sterile lower respiratory tract when mucociliary clearance mechanisms are functioning effectively. This contrasts with the colon, where bacteria are continuously present and epithelial cells are constitutively activated. Although the surface area of the lungs presents a large target for microbial invasion, activated lung epithelial cells that are closely apposed to deposited pathogens are ideally positioned for microbial killing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据