标题
Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 213-241
出版商
Annual Reviews
发表日期
2014-03-29
DOI
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185529
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
- (2013) Alessandro Liberati ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Severing the Link Between Coverage Policy and the US Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Steven H. Woolf et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis
- (2013) Pim Cuijpers et al. BMJ Open
- A "SMART" Design for Building Individualized Treatment Sequences
- (2012) H. Lei et al. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- In Guidelines We Cannot Trust
- (2012) Terrence Shaneyfelt ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Failure of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Meet Institute of Medicine Standards
- (2012) Justin Kung et al. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Knowledge translation of research findings
- (2012) Jeremy M Grimshaw et al. Implementation Science
- Problem-Solving Therapy and Supportive Therapy in Older Adults With Major Depression and Executive Dysfunction
- (2011) George S. Alexopoulos et al. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
- Cognitive and behavior therapy in the treatment and prevention of depression
- (2011) Hollon Steven D. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
- Clinical practice guidelines to inform evidence-based clinical practice
- (2011) J. Stuart Wolf et al. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Knowledge Translation in Audiology
- (2011) Sheila T. Moodie et al. Trends in Amplification
- Problem-Solving Therapy and Supportive Therapy in Older Adults With Major Depression and Executive Dysfunction
- (2010) Patricia A. Areán et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- National Trends in the Treatment for Depression From 1998 to 2007
- (2010) Steven C. Marcus et al. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
- Efficacy of cognitive–behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias
- (2010) Pim Cuijpers et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review
- (2010) K. G. Shojania et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
- (2010) M. C. Brouwers et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Antidepressant Drug Effects and Depression Severity
- (2010) Jay C. Fournier et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Assessing and reporting heterogeneity in treatment effects in clinical trials: a proposal
- (2010) David M Kent et al. Trials
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
- (2010) Hilda Bastian et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Are Psychological and Pharmacologic Interventions Equally Effective in the Treatment of Adult Depressive Disorders?
- (2009) Pim Cuijpers et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
- Under-representation of women and ethnic minorities in vascular surgery randomized controlled trials
- (2009) Andrew W. Hoel et al. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
- AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program
- (2008) Roger Chou et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy
- (2008) Erick H. Turner et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Observational Research, Randomised Trials, and Two Views of Medical Science
- (2008) Jan P Vandenbroucke PLOS MEDICINE
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started