4.7 Article

Excess risk of hospital admission for cardiovascular disease within the first 7 years from onset of inflammatory polyarthritis

期刊

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 1660-1664

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2009.121871

关键词

-

资金

  1. Arthritis Research Campaign, UK [17552]
  2. Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Subjects with rheumatoid factor positive inflammatory polyarthritis (IP) are known to have increased mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). A study was undertaken to examine the risk and baseline predictors of admission with CVD in patients with recent-onset IP. Methods Subjects are recruited by the Norfolk Arthritis Register if they present to primary or secondary care with >= 2 swollen joints lasting >= 4 weeks. This analysis includes subjects recruited between 1995 and 1999. Baseline data on lifestyle, demographic characteristics, disease and treatment characteristics were collected. CVD admissions were identified through record linkage with the only acute care hospital in the study region. First-episode hospitalisation rates were compared with those of the general population. Poisson regression was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) of admission for patients with IP (overall and for each risk factor). Death certificates were obtained from the national death register. Results 800 patients with recent-onset IP were followed for a median of 7.0 years. 64 CVD-related hospitalisations were observed (11.7 per 1000 person-years). Patients with IP were twice as likely (RR=2.0; 95% CI 1.5 to 2.5) to be hospitalised for CVD as the general population. Difficulty walking at baseline was a significant predictor of CVD admission and baseline non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug use was associated with a reduced risk of CVD admission. Conclusions Patients with IP are at increased risk of CVD-related hospitalisation, within 7 years of symptom onset. Informing patients about lifestyle modification may reduce the risk of CVD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据