4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Vasopressin Does Not Mediate Hypersensitivity of the Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Axis during Chronic Stress

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1410.037

关键词

stress; vasopressin; HPA axis; vasopressin antagonists; vasopressin V1b receptor

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH
  2. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [Z01HD000631, Z01HD008813] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hypothesis that vasopressin (VP) becomes the main mediator of pituitary corticotroph responsiveness during chronic hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis activation was tested by examining the effect of pharmacologic VP receptor blockade on the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosterone responses of 14-day repeatedly restrained rats. In spite of the increased vasopressinergic activity, repeatedly restrained rats showed lower ACTH and corticosterone responses to 10 min white noise compared with handled controls. These responses were unchanged by injection of the nonpeptide-selective V1b receptor antagonist SSR149415 i.v., 1 h before noise application. In contrast to noise stress, plasma ACTH responses to i.p. hypertonic saline injection were enhanced in the repeatedly restrained rats compared with handled controls, but responses were also unaffected by SSR149415 administered orally, daily 1 h before restraint. Since SSR149415 effectiveness was low, we used minipump infusion of the peptide V1 receptor antagonist, dGly[Phaa1,D-tyr(et), Lys, Arg]VP (V1-Ant) for 14 days, which effectively blocked ACTH responses to exogenous VP Chronic V1-Ant infusion reduced plasma ACTH responses to i.p. hypertonic saline in handled controls but not in repeatedly restrained rats. These data suggest that the increased vasopressinergic activity characteristic of chronic stress plays roles other than mediating the hypersensitivity of the HPA axis to a novel stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据