4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Drivers of Cost for Pancreatic Surgery: It's Not About Hospital Volume

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 13, 页码 3804-3811

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6758-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH) [UL1TR001860]
  2. Agency for Health Care Research and Quality [T32HS 022236]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundOutcomes for pancreatic resection have been studied extensively due to the high morbidity and mortality rates, with high-volume centers achieving superior outcomes.Ongoing investigations include healthcare costs, given the national focus on reducing expenditures. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the relationships between pancreatic surgery costs with perioperative outcomes and volume status.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 27,653 patients who underwent elective pancreatic resections from October 2013 to June 2017 using the Vizient database. Costs were calculated from charges using cost-charge ratios and adjusted for geographic variation.Generalized linear modeling adjusting for demographic, clinical, and operation characteristics was performed to assess the relationships between cost and length of stay, complications, in-hospital mortality, readmissions, and hospital volume. High-volume centers were defined as hospitals performing19 operations annually.ResultsThe unadjusted mean cost for pancreatic resection and corresponding hospitalization was $20,352. There were no differences in mean costs for pancreatectomies performed at high- and low-volume centers [-$1175, 95% confidence interval (CI) -$3254 to $904, p=0.27]. In subgroup analysis comparing adjusted mean costs at high- and low-volume centers, there was no difference among patients without an adverse outcome (-$99, 95% CI -$1612 to 1414, p=0.90), one or more adverse outcomes (-$1586, 95% CI -$4771 to 1599, p=0.33), or one or more complications (-$2835, 95% CI -$7588 to 1919, p=0.24).ConclusionsWhile high-volume hospitals have fewer adverse outcomes, there is no relationship between surgical volume and costs, which suggests that, in itself, surgical volume is not an indicator of improved healthcare efficiency reflected by lower costs. Patient referral to high-volume centers may not reduce overall healthcare expenditures for pancreatic operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Pediatrics

Trends of paediatric head injury and acute care costs in Australia

Sonia Singh, Franz E. Babl, Stephen J. C. Hearps, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Kim Dalziel, John A. Cheek

Summary: The incidence of paediatric head injuries in Australia has significantly increased over the past five years, with acute care costs reaching $154 million. Falls are the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 47% of acute care costs, followed by transportation-related injuries at 35%. Population-based efforts for road safety and injury prevention are crucial.

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH (2022)

Article Pediatrics

Paediatric traumatic brain injury severity and acute care costs

Sonia Singh, Franz E. Babl, Li Huang, Stephen Hearps, John Alexander Cheek, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Vicki Anderson, Kim Dalziel

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD (2022)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Economic evaluation of return-to-work interventions for mental disorder-related sickness absence: two years follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Anna Finnes, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Pia Enebrink, JoAnne Dahl, Ata Ghaderi, Anna Nager, Inna Feldman

Summary: This study assessed the long-term cost-effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a workplace dialog intervention (WDI), and ACT+WDI compared to treatment as usual (TAU) for common mental disorders, and investigated any differences in cost-effectiveness between diagnostic groups.

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH (2022)

Review Economics

Economic Evaluation of In-Hospital Clinical Practices in Acute Injury Care: A Systematic Review

Blanchard Conombo, Jason R. Guertin, Pier-Alexandre Tardif, Marc-Aurele Gagnon, Cecile Duval, Patrick Archambault, Simon Berthelot, Francois Lauzier, Alexis F. Turgeon, Henry T. Stelfox, Michael Chasse, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Belinda Gabbe, Howard Champion, Fiona Lecky, Peter Cameron, Lynne Moore

Summary: This research systematically reviewed the economic value of in-hospital clinical practices in acute injury care and found that almost half of the clinical interventions studied in acute injury care may not be cost-effective. Additionally, the study identified more cost-effectiveness research in certain medical fields.

VALUE IN HEALTH (2022)

Article Pediatrics

Cost-effectiveness of patient observation on cranial CT use with minor head trauma

Sonia Singh, Stephen Hearps, Daniel K. Nishijima, John Alexander Cheek, Meredith Borland, Stuart Dalziel, James Holmes, Nathan Kuppermann, Franz E. Babl, Jeffrey S. Hoch

Summary: The study found that planned observation in children with minor head trauma is cost-effective for reducing CT use, especially for those in the PECARN intermediate-risk and high-risk categories.

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

The FACT-8D, a new cancer-specific utility algorithm based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapies-General (FACT-G): a Canadian valuation study

Helen McTaggart-Cowan, Madeleine T. King, Richard Norman, Daniel S. J. Costa, A. Simon Pickard, Rosalie Viney, Stuart J. Peacock

Summary: The Canadian value set for FACT-8D derived from a discrete choice experiment showed that pain, nausea, and work problems have the largest impact on utility, and the worst possible health state has a utility score considerably worse than being dead. This provides important insights and foundation for cancer research and evaluation.

HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2022)

Article Mathematical & Computational Biology

Net-benefit regression with censored cost-effectiveness data from randomized or observational studies

Shuai Chen, Jeffrey S. Hoch

Summary: This study focuses on methods for censored cost-effectiveness data in the context of new medical interventions evaluation. The proposed methods include the net-benefit regression framework and a doubly robust estimator for average causal incremental net benefit, showing valid inference in observational studies. Extensive numerical studies confirm the finite-sample performance of these methods and demonstrate their application with real data examples.

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2022)

Review Health Care Sciences & Services

Economic evaluations of audit and feedback interventions: a systematic review

Lynne Moore, Jason Robert Guertin, Pier-Alexandre Tardif, Noah Michael Ivers, Jeffrey Hoch, Blanchard Conombo, Jesmin Antony, Henry Thomas Stelfox, Simon Berthelot, Patrick Archambault, Alexis Turgeon, Rohit Gandhi, J. M. Grimshaw

Summary: This study aimed to assess the economic benefits of audit and feedback (A&F) interventions for improving compliance to healthcare guidelines. The findings suggest that A&F interventions may have a high potential for cost-effectiveness, especially in studies based on health outcomes and with high reporting quality. However, publication bias may have led to an overestimation of their economic value.

BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY (2022)

Article Immunology

Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cell Therapy Is More Cost-Effective Than Fecal Diversion for Treatment of Perianal Crohn's Disease Fistulas

Sheeva Johnson, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Wissam J. Halabi, Jeffrey Ko, Jan Nolta, Maneesh Dave

Summary: This study developed a decision tree model to compare the cost-effectiveness of MSCs and FD for pCD, and found that both autologous and allogeneic MSCs are more cost-effective than FD. Even in the worst-case scenario, MSCs still save costs compared to FD.

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY (2022)

Article Chemistry, Analytical

A Smart Technology Intervention in the Homes of People with Mental Illness and Physical Comorbidities

Cheryl Forchuk, Abraham Rudnick, Deborah Corring, Daniel Lizotte, Jeffrey S. S. Hoch, Richard Booth, Barbara Frampton, Rupinder Mann, Jonathan Serrato

Summary: This mixed-method study evaluated a smart home technology intervention for people living in the community with mental illness and physical comorbidities, providing appropriate support in the home and health monitoring capabilities for healthcare providers. Thirteen participants were recruited and provided with smartphones, touchscreen monitors, and health devices. Descriptive statistics showed improvements in physical and mental health, as well as enhanced communication with care providers and friends/family. The study also addressed technical difficulties, ethics analyses, policy implications, and economic costs.

SENSORS (2023)

Review Psychiatry

Effectiveness of Digital Mental Health Tools to Reduce Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jiyeong Kim, Lois M. D. Aryee, Heejung Bang, Steffi Prajogo, Yong K. Choi, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Elizabeth L. Prado

Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The findings showed that digital mental health tools were moderately to highly effective in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms in LMICs.

JMIR MENTAL HEALTH (2023)

Article Oncology

Factors Associated With Online Patient-Provider Communications Among Cancer Survivors in the United States During COVID-19: Cross-sectional Study

Jiyeong Kim, Eleni Linos, Debra A. Fishman, Melanie S. Dove, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Theresa H. Keegan

Summary: This study aims to assess the prevalence of online patient-provider communication (OPPC) during COVID-19 among cancer survivors and adults without a history of cancer. The results showed an increase in the use of email/internet and electronic health records for communication among cancer survivors during COVID-19. However, certain vulnerable subgroups had lower rates of OPPC, such as those with low income, no usual source of care, or reporting depression.

JMIR CANCER (2023)

Article Oncology

Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: How Much Uncertainty Is in the Results?

Heather K. Barr, Andrea M. Guggenbickler, Jeffrey S. Hoch, Carolyn S. Dewa

Summary: This paper discusses the cost-effectiveness analysis of new cancer treatments in real-world settings and the statistical uncertainty that often accompanies the results. It identifies five methods to characterize statistical uncertainty and explores their usage in previous studies. Understanding the necessity and meaning of uncertainty in real-world cost-effectiveness analysis can improve patient outcomes.

CURRENT ONCOLOGY (2023)

Meeting Abstract Oncology

A 20-Year Review of the Ontario Radiation Therapy Access to Care Crisis: Lessons Applied to the COVID-19 Pandemic

G. Mitera, C. Earle, J. S. Hoch, M. Dobrow

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS (2022)

Article Oncology

Lessons from Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Smoking Cessation Programs for Cancer Patients

Jeffrey S. Hoch, Heather K. Barr, Andrea M. Guggenbickler, Carolyn S. Dewa

Summary: This study examines the cost-effectiveness and potential impact of smoking cessation programs (SCPs) for cancer patients. The findings suggest that SCPs can be an economically attractive way to improve outcomes for cancer patients when offered alongside standard cancer care.

CURRENT ONCOLOGY (2022)

暂无数据