4.7 Article

Impact of KRAS and EGFR Gene Mutations on Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Surgically Resected Lung Adenocarcinomas

期刊

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 S347-S354

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1799-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23659666] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Oncogenic gene mutations observed in lung adenocarcinomas, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS, have some predictive value for chemotherapeutic drugs or EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. However, the influence of these gene alterations on patients' prognosis remains controversial. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the tumors of 180 patients with completely resected pathological stage I-III lung adenocarcinoma which harbored either KRAS codon 12 mutation or EGFR gene mutations within exons 18-21 to investigate the impact of these gene mutations on the patients' survival. Gene mutations were detected by established methods. Results. Of 180 patients, 32 had KRAS codon 12 mutations (KRAS group), 148 had EGFR mutations within exon 18-21 (EGFR group). Pathological stage and operation mode were independent factors for disease-free survival. However, the EGFR group had better overall survival than the KRAS group (P = 0.0271). Cox proportional hazard model revealed pathological stage (P = 0.0001) and presence of EGFR gene mutations (P = 0.0408) were independent factors for overall survival. In survival after tumor recurrence, the EGFR group had a better median survival time (46.7 months) after recurrence than the KRAS group (26.0 months). Conclusions. In patients with completely resected lung adenocarcinomas, KRAS and EGFR gene mutation status of tumors was not associated with disease-free survival. However, the presence of an EGFR gene mutation boded well for the patient's overall survival, and thus patients with EGFR mutations have a better prognosis than those with KRAS mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据