4.7 Article

A clinical-biological risk stratification model for resected gastric cancer: prognostic impact of Her2, Fhit, and APC expression status

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 693-701

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds506

关键词

APC; Fhit; gastric cancer; Her2; prognosis; score

类别

资金

  1. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC-Project Veneto Region)
  2. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC-IG ) [11930]
  3. MIUR-PRIN [2009X23L78_005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To obtain a prognostic stratification model for resected gastric cancer patients. Patients and methods: Clinicopathological and molecular data (expression of Cdx2, Apc, beta-catenin, E-cadherin, Fhit, p53, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her2); HER2 and TOPO2A gene copy number; PIK3CA mutations; microsatellite instability) were, correlated to cancer-specific/overall survival (CSS/OS) using a Cox model. Individual patient probability (IPP) was estimated by logistic equation. A continuous score to identify risk-classes was derived according to the model ratios. Results: Two-hundred eight patients were studied (median follow-up 20 months). At multivariate analysis, sex, stage, margins, location, nodes, Apc, and Fhit were independent predictors for CSS; the same factors (and age and Her2, except Fhit) predicted OS. Multivariate model predicted IPP with high prognostic accuracy (0.90 for CSS; 0.91 for OS). A two-class model significantly separated low- and high-risk patients for CSS (23.4% and 85.6%, P < 0.0001) and OS (21.4% and 82.0%, P < 0.0001). A three-class model differentiated low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients for CSS (6.3%, 35.3%, and 88.0%, P < 0.0001) and OS (6.1%, 34.6%, and 86.5%, P < 0.0001). Conclusions: A risk classification system comprising the immunohistochemical expression of three proteins (Apc, Fhit, and Her2) and five clinicopathological parameters (stage, resected nodes, margins, location, and sex) accurately separates the resected gastric cancer patients into three classes of risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据