4.7 Review

Interdisciplinary management of EGFR-inhibitor-induced skin reactions: a German expert opinion

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 3, 页码 524-535

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq387

关键词

acneiform rash; cetuximab; EGFR inhibitors; panitumumab; skin reaction; treatment recommendations

类别

资金

  1. Amgen
  2. Merck
  3. Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment strategies, i.e. monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab, or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as erlotinib and gefitinib, have expanded the treatment options for different tumor types. Dermatologic toxic effects are the most common side-effects of EGFR inhibitor therapy. They can profoundly affect the patient's quality of life. Purpose: The aim of this study was to provide interdisciplinary expert recommendations on how to treat patients with skin reactions undergoing anti-EGFR treatment. Material and methods: An expert panel from Germany with expertise in medical oncology, dermatology or clinical pharmacology was convened to develop expert recommendations based on published peer-reviewed literature. Results: The expert recommendations for the state-of-the-art treatment of skin reactions induced by EGFR inhibitor therapy include recommendations for diagnostics and grading as well as grade-specific and stage-adapted treatment approaches and preventive measures. It was concluded that EGFR-inhibitor-related dermatologic reactions should always be treated combining basic care of the skin and a specific therapy adapted to stage and grade of skin reaction. For grade 2 and above, specific treatment recommendations for early-and later-stage skin reactions induced by EGFR-inhibitor therapy were proposed. Conclusion: This paper presents a German national expert opinion for the treatment of skin reactions in patients receiving EGFR inhibitor therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据