4.7 Review

Testing new regimens in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: analysis of publications from the last 10 years

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1266-1272

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq608

关键词

phase II trials; second-line regimens; soft tissue sarcoma

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The prognosis of advanced soft tissue sarcoma remains poor. Many phase II trials investigating new regimens have been published in the last 10 years. Materials and methods: Full English-language reports of phase II clinical trials from January 1999 to October 2009 have been reviewed. We have defined those that provided 3- and 6-month progression-free survival rates (PFSR) >39% and 14%, respectively, as promising second-line regimens. For studies enrolling both chemonaive and pretreated patients, we have compared the reported PFSR3 to the expected PFSR3 of an active treatment administered in the same proportions of pretreated and nonpretreated patients. Results: Forty-nine trials were identified. Among the trials investigating new regimens in pretreated patients alone, the promising second-line regimens were ifosfamide, brostallicin, pazopanib (except in liposarcoma), temozolomide, trabectedin, dacarbazine-gemcitabine and docetaxel (Taxotere)-gemcitabine combinations (in uterine leiomyosarcoma). Among the trials enrolling both chemonaive and pretreated patients, most regimens reached the level of efficacy; moreover, in three trials, the reported PFSR3 was particularly high: weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in angiosarcoma, docetaxel-gemcitabine combination (in uterine leiomyosarcoma) and oral perifosine. Conclusions: In the past 10 years, several drugs or combinations have demonstrated promising activity in exploratory phase II trials and warrant further investigation in appropriate phase III trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据