4.3 Article

Comparative Effect of Green Tea, Chokeberry and Honeysuckle Polyphenols on Nutrients and Mineral Absorption and Digestibility in Rats

期刊

ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 163-169

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000278747

关键词

Polyphenols; Polyphenols, biological properties; Polyphenols, digestibility in rats; Chokeberry extract; Green tea extract

资金

  1. State Committee for Scientific Research [3 P06T 046 24]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Natural polyphenols are chemically and biologically active. This study aimed at examining the physiological effects of high doses of polyphenol extracts from green tea and new polyphenol-rich sources (chokeberry and honeysuckle fruits) on nutrient absorption. Methods: 32 male Wistar rats were divided into four groups and fed a diet supplemented with one of the three polyphenolic extracts (at 0.4%) or a control diet for 4 weeks. A perfusion technique was used to study the effects at intestinal level. Pure polyphenols from the three sources were introduced into perfusion fluid at a concentration of 0.4% and allowed to cross the intestinal tract in 1.5 h. Results: In the perfusion experiment, addition of the extracts caused a strong and statistically significant reduction in absorption of the selected nutrients (water, glucose, cholesterol, amino acids and minerals) compared to control animals. In the nutritional experiment, we recorded a slight decrease in diet utilization and growth in rats on polyphenolic diets relative to control group. In the same experiment, we observed a reduction of Zn and Cu absorption, but this was not accompanied by diminished concentrations in the bone femur. Conclusions: The presence of the polyphenolic extracts in the perfusion liquids significantly reduced absorption from the small intestine, but the nutritional experiment did not confirm deleterious consequences of the consumption of high extract doses. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据