4.0 Article

Influences of Age, Gender, and Circadian Rhythm on Deceleration Capacity in Subjects without Evident Heart Diseases

期刊

ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 158-166

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/anec.12189

关键词

autonomic nervous system; deceleration capacity; heart rate variability; age; gender; circadian rhythm

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2012FFB02519]
  2. Wuhan Science and Technology Program [2014060101010032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundDeceleration capacity (DC) is a newly found predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction. Age-, gender-, and circadian rhythm-related differences in DC may limit its predictive value, which should be considered in clinical settings. MethodsDC, average heart rate, and HRV parameters, including 24 hours, awaking state (15:00-20:00) and sleeping mode (00:00-05:00) strips from 24 hours Holter recordings in 636 subjects without heart diseases were examined. Heart rate variability was analyzed in time domains (standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals [SDNN], normal-to-normal RR intervals in all 5-minute segments [SDANN], and root mean square successive difference [RMSSD]). ResultsThe DC, SDNN, SDANN, RMSSD, and heart rate decreased with age. Deceleration capacity was significantly lower in patients greater than 50 years of age. The largest decrease of SDNN, SDANN, and RMSSD occurred in patients 30-39 years of age. The values of SDNN, SDANN, and DC of women were lower than that of men in the young and middle-aged groups, but age-related decrease of DC in men was greater than that in women. Heart rate of women was significantly higher than that of men in younger subjects, especially in a sleeping mode. There were higher values of DC and RMSSD during sleeping than that during a waking state. ConclusionsThe age, gender, and circadian rhythm may be useful when evaluating cardiac autonomic function and need to be considered when evaluating DC and HRV in clinical and scientific researches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据