4.3 Article

Natural selection and demographic transition in a Zapotec-speaking genetic isolate in the Valley of Oaxaca, southern Mexico

期刊

ANNALS OF HUMAN BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 34-49

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03014460701769808

关键词

natural selection; demographic transition; secular trends; mortality; fertility; anthropological populations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The study analyzed the potential for natural selection and the demographic transition in an isolated Amerindian population in the process of secular change in body size. Setting: A genetically isolated, Zapotec-speaking community located in the Valley of Oaxaca, southern Mexico, has been studied regularly from the mid-1960s to 2000. Children, adolescents and young adults have experienced a recent secular increase in body size since 1978 after a major period of no change. Methods: Potential for natural selection and the demographic transition were analyzed over a 100-year period, ca 1900-2000. National census data, results from anthropological surveys and community archives and reports were used. Results: Opportunity for natural selection changed markedly over the last century. Demographic transition to Stage II occurred ca 1955 and preceded a secular increase in body size. The crossover between curves for mortality (I-m) and fertility (I-f) occurred at approximately the time of onset of the secular trend among children, adolescents and young adults, i.e. those born since the early 1970s. Conclusions: The 'classic' demographic transition occurred in the mid-1950s and preceded the secular increase in body size. A 'critical mass' of environmental improvement appears to be necessary to activate secular improvements in growth status, possibly turning on a gene complex that interacts with the improved environmental conditions. The lead time from the onset of demographic transition phase II to beginning of the secular trend is approximately 25 years (one generation) in this community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据