4.5 Article

Mediators of the association between parental severe mental illness and offspring neurodevelopmental problems

期刊

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 24, 期 9, 页码 629-634

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.05.010

关键词

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; Autism spectrum disorder; Infant; Small for gestational age; Birth weight; Gestational age

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD061817]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [MH094011]
  3. Swedish council for working life and social research
  4. Swedish Research Council (Medicine)
  5. Swedish Society of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Parental severe mental illness (SMI) is associated with an increased risk of offspring autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We conducted a study to examine the extent to which risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and small for gestational age mediated this association. Methods: We obtained data on offspring born 1992-2001 in Sweden (n = 870,017) through the linkage of multiple population-based registers. We used logistic and Cox regression to assess the associations between parental SMI, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and offspring ASD and ADHD, as well as tested whether adverse pregnancy outcomes served as mediators. Results: After controlling for measured covariates, maternal and paternal SMI were associated with an increased risk for preterm birth, low birth weight, and gestational age, and for offspring ASD and ADHD. These pregnancy outcomes were also associated with an increased risk of ASD and ADHD. We found that pregnancy outcomes did not mediate the association between parental SMI and offspring ASD and ADHD, as there was no substantial change in magnitude of the risk estimates after controlling for pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: Parental SMI and adverse pregnancy outcomes appear to be independent risk factors for offspring ASD and ADHD. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据