4.7 Article

Proactive remanufacturing timing determination method based on residual strength

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 17, 页码 5193-5206

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2015.1012599

关键词

proactive remanufacturing timing; residual strength; remanufacture

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2011CB013406]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305119]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-12-0837]
  4. SINOTRUK, Jinan Fuqiang power Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, since the resources of remanufacturing are the 'cores', the uncertainty in quantity and quality of the 'cores' is an obstacle in remanufacturing engineering. To solve this problem, production management and design for remanufacturing have been discussed in the former studies. However, the current remanufacturing mode, which is carried out in the end of life cycle, is reactive. To delimit the uncertainty of 'cores', the concept of proactive remanufacturing is presented in this paper. And one issue is to identify the proactive remanufacturing timing. In the beginning, the reactive remanufacturing timing and proactive remanufacturing timing are introduced. Then, to characterise the remanufacturability of components, the concept of residual strength is proposed. To identify the proactive remanufacturing timing, the mathematical model is established based on the residual strength, remanufacturing value and technical feasibility. Based on this model, the timing determination method in proactive remanufacturing is presented and expanded. Finally, to validate this method, the proactive remanufacturing timing of engines is determined by analysing the crankshaft. As a consequence, in the proactive remanufacturing mode, the remanufacturing rate of product might be increased. Thus, the proactive remanufacturing could provide a new perspective in future remanufacturing engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据