4.4 Article

Cloning, expression, molecular modelling and docking analysis of glutathione transferase from Saccharum officinarum

期刊

ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY
卷 159, 期 2, 页码 267-280

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00491.x

关键词

Glutathione S-transferase; molecular modelling; site-directed mutagenesis; sugarcane

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [09/54676-0, 04/08444-6]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq-Brazil)
  3. Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira (CTC, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sugarcane yield and quality are affected by a number of biotic and abiotic stresses. In response to such stresses, plants may increase the activities of some enzymes such as glutathione transferase (GST), which are involved in the detoxification of xenobiotics. Thus, a sugarcane GST was modelled and molecular docked using the program LIGIN to investigate the contributions of the active site residues towards the binding of reduced glutathione (GSH) and 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB). As a result, W13 and I119 were identified as key residues for the specificity of sugarcane GSTF1 (SoGSTF1) towards CDNB. To obtain a better understanding of the catalytic specificity of sugarcane GST (SoGSTF1), two mutants were designed, W13L and I119F. Tertiary structure models and the same docking procedure were performed to explain the interactions between sugarcane GSTs with GSH and CDNB. An electron-sharing network for GSH interaction was also proposed. The SoGSTF1 and the mutated gene constructions were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli and the expressed protein purified. Kinetic analyses revealed different Km values not only for CDNB, but also for GSH. The Km values were 0.2, 1.3 and 0.3 mM for GSH, and 0.9, 1.2 and 0.5 mM for CDNB, for the wild type, W13L mutant and I119F mutant, respectively. The V-max values were 297.6, 224.5 and 171.8 mu mol min(-1) mg(-1) protein for GSH, and 372.3, 170.6 and 160.4 mu mol min(-1) mg(-1) protein for CDNB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据