4.4 Article

The economic impact of allergic rhinitis and current guidelines for treatment

期刊

ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 S12-S16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.10.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alcon
  2. Amgen
  3. Alexza
  4. Astellas
  5. AstraZeneca
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Capnia
  8. Genentech
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. MAP Pharmaceuticals
  11. Meda
  12. Merck
  13. Novartis
  14. Sanoti-Aventis
  15. Schering-Plough
  16. Sepracor
  17. Teva
  18. Astra-Zeneca
  19. Meda Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To describe the economic burden of allergic rhinitis treatment and current guidelines for treatment. Data Sources: Review articles and original research were retrieved from MEDLINE, OVID, Pub Med (1950-November 2009), personal files of articles, and bibliographies of located articles that addressed the topic of interest. Study Selection: Articles were selected for their relevance to the burden of allergic rhinitis and current guidelines for treatment. Publications included reviews, treatment guidelines, and clinical studies. Results: Despite the common symptoms of allergic rhinitis, its impact on patient quality of life, and the huge cost to society and individuals of treatment, including pharmacotherapy, many patients do not adhere to their medication regimens because the medications do not adequately address their symptoms or are otherwise problematic for them to use. Conclusions: The economic impact of allergic rhinitis is substantial; the total direct medical cost of allergic rhinitis is approximately $3.4 billion, with almost half of this cost attributable to prescription medications. Multiple treatment options are available, and these were reviewed to provide an update on effectiveness and adverse effects that may affect patient adherence. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106:S12-S16.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据