4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Nonlinear dynamic impact analysis for installing a dry storage canister into a vertical concrete cask

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.006

关键词

Dry storage canister; Impact analysis; Accident movement; Explicit finite element

资金

  1. National Energy Project phase I
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [ANS040401]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a series of dynamic impact analysis for installing a dry storage canister into a vertical concrete cask (VCC) is performed. The dry storage system considered herein is called HCDSS-69, recently developed by INER and being capable of accommodating 69 bundles of BWR spent nuclear fuels. The impact accident is stemming from a conservative consideration of accidental movement when the canister is being hoisted into a VCC. According to NUREG-0554, the accidental movement is conservatively simulated by 80 mm- and 160 mm-height free-drop motions and then with straight and 2 degrees-oblique impact to a pedestal in VCC. A symmetric fully 3-D finite element model is built and analyzed using the explicit finite element code, LS-DYNA. Geometrical, contact, and material nonlinearities are all taken into account. The analysis result concludes that the permanent deformations of the canister are not severe to affect fuel retrieve after the impact accident and the maximum stress intensity in the canister shell can meet the ASME code appendix F F-1340, preventing the leakage of radioactive materials. The study also found that with properly reducing the wall thickness of the pedestal cylinder, the maximum acceleration and permanent deformation of the canister can be much alleviated, even though the drop height is increased to the double of the required brake distance specified in NUREG-0554. The damages of the pedestal in each analysis are moderate so that the heat transfer condition after the impact accident can be bounded by the off-normal event for half-blockage of air inlets. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据