4.4 Review

Reproductive aspects of male franciscana dolphins (Pontoporia blainvillei) off Argentina

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION SCIENCE
卷 131, 期 1-2, 页码 41-48

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.02.005

关键词

Pontoporia; Reproductive biology; Sexual maturity; Testis; South America; Argentina

资金

  1. CONICET, MACN/CONICET
  2. FCEyN, UBA
  3. FM, UBA/CONICET
  4. LECyMM, MACN/CONICET
  5. Feliz Azara Foundation
  6. University of Valencia
  7. Society of Marine Mammalogy
  8. Cetacean Society International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the first study to investigate reproductive aspects of male franciscana dolphin - Pontoporia blainvillei - in Argentine waters, the aim of this paper was to assess sexual maturity by using histological and morphometric methods. P. blainvillei was labeled as Vulnerable by the IUCN in 2008. The specimens analyzed were either incidentally caught in artisanal fishing nets (n = 47) or found stranded on the beach (n = 3). Testis weight and testicular index of maturity were reliable indicators of sexual maturity, being their values: MTW: 1.14 +/- 0.60-4.49 +/- 1.94; IM: 0.03 +/- 0.01-0.09 +/- 0.03, for immature and mature specimens' respectively. It was found that the hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) might be appropriate for establishing sexual maturity stage, based on both the body morphometric measurements and age. The values for age, standard length and total weight at attainment sexual maturity were 2.92-3.54 years, 126.19-126.27 cm and 23.47-23.75 kg. Considering the extremely low relative testis weight, the reversed sexual length dimorphism, the absence of secondary sexual characteristics, and the lack of scars from intrasexual combats in males, the hypothesis that sperm competition does not occur in the species, and male combats for accessing female reproductive may be rare for P. blainvillei is reinforced. All these features fit the species within a serial monogamous mating system. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据