4.5 Article

Mapping of quantitative trait loci for clinical-chemical traits in swine

期刊

ANIMAL GENETICS
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 57-64

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01804.x

关键词

clinical-chemical traits; disease resistance; quantitative trait loci; Sarcocystis; swine

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG: Deutsche Forschungs-gemeinschaft)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical-chemical traits are diagnostic parameters essential for characterization of health and disease in veterinary practice. The traits show significant variability and are under genetic control, but little is known about the fundamental genetic architecture of this variability, especially in swine. We have identified QTL for alkaline phosphatase ( ALP), lactate ( LAC), bilirubin (BIL), creatinine (CRE) and ionized sodium (Na+), potassium (K+) and calcium ( Ca++) from the serum of 139 F-2 pigs from a Meishan/Pietrain family before and after challenge with Sarcocystis miescheriana, a protozoan parasite of muscle. After infection, the pigs passed through three stages representing acute disease, subclinical disease and chronic disease. Forty-two QTL influencing clinical-chemical traits during these different stages were identified on 15 chromosomes. Eleven of the QTL were significant on a genome-wide level; 31 QTL were chromosome-wide significant. QTL showed specific health/disease patterns with respect to the baseline values of the traits as well as the values obtained through the different stages of disease. QTL influencing different traits at different times were found primarily on chromosomes 1, 3, 7 and 14. The most prominent QTL for the investigated clinical-chemical traits mapped to SSC3 and 7. Baseline traits of ALP, LAC, BIL, Ca++ and K+ were influenced by QTL regions on SSC3, 6, 7, 8 and 13. Single QTL explained up to 21.7% of F-2 phenotypic variance. Our analysis confirms that variation of clinical-chemical traits is associated with multiple chromosomal regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据