4.5 Article

Incubation behaviour and hatching synchrony differ in wild and captive populations of the zebra finch

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 85, 期 6, 页码 1329-1334

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.03.023

关键词

domestication; hatching asynchrony; incubation; parental effect; Taeniopygia guttata; zebra finch

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [ARC DP0881019]
  2. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hatching asynchrony is widespread in birds laying clutches containing multiple eggs, yet is seemingly paradoxical as the age and size hierarchies result in asymmetric sibling competition and low survival prospects for late-hatched nestlings. We examined the causes of variation in hatching asynchrony between broods of zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata, in three environments: domesticated, captive wild and wild free-living. We found that broods of both domesticated and wild birds taken into captivity hatched more asynchronously than wild free-living broods. This was directly attributable to both male and female parents of domesticated and captive wild broods initiating incubation as soon as the first egg was laid as opposed to when the clutch was virtually complete in wild free-living broods. Wild free-living birds that were transferred to captive environments immediately switched to the incubation onset behaviour seen in domesticated birds, thereby demonstrating a previously unsuspected level of intraspecific plasticity in incubation behaviour. This finding suggests that something about the captive environment is driving the early onset of incubation and contributing to an elevated level of hatching asynchrony in captive birds. Across all populations and environments males contributed almost equally to incubation, and the onset of incubation by males was highly coordinated with that of their partner. (C) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据