4.6 Article

Fentanyl Utility Function: A Risk-Benefit Composite of Pain Relief and Breathing Responses

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 663-674

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829ce4cb

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grunenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany
  2. Mundipharma Research, Ltd. (Cambridge, United Kingdom)
  3. Galleon Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Horsham, Pennsylvania)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Integrating opioid risk and benefit into a single function may give a useful single measure of the opioid's positive and negative effects. An explorative study on the effects of fentanyl on antinociception and respiratory depression was performed to construct fentanyl risk-benefit (utility) functions. Methods: Twelve volunteers received a 3.5-g/kg fentanyl intravenous injection on 2 separate study days. On one occasion, ventilation at a clamped increased carbon dioxide concentration was measured and on another the pain tolerance to electrical stimulation. In both sessions, arterial plasma samples were obtained. The data were analyzed with a population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. A simulation study was performed, using the model parameter estimates and their variances, in which simulated subjects received 3.5 g/kg of fentanyl. The resultant distributions were used to calculate the utility functions, defined as the probability of at least 50% analgesia (an increase in pain tolerance by 50%) minus the probability of at least 50% respiratory depression (a reduction in ventilation by 50%). Utility functions were constructed in concentration and time domains. Results: Fentanyl produced significant respiratory depression and analgesia. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models adequately described the data. The constructed utility functions were negative at effect-site concentrations of greater than 0.5ng/ml in the first 90min after the 3.5 g/kg bolus infusion. Conclusions: Utility functions based on fentanyl's experimental effects on respiration and pain relief were successfully constructed. These functions are useful in multiple effect comparisons among experimental drugs. Further studies are required to assess whether this risk-benefit analysis is valuable in clinical practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据