4.6 Article

Preoperative Use of Statins Is Associated with Reduced Early Delirium Rates after Cardiac Surgery

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 67-73

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b4d9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Delirium is an acute deterioration of brain function characterized by fluctuating consciousness and an inability to maintain attention. Use of statins has been shown to decrease morbidity and mortality after major surgical procedures. The objective of this study was to determine an association between preoperative administration of statins and postoperative delirium in a large prospective cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, data ere prospectively collected on consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from April 2005 to June 2006 in an academic hospital. All patients were screened for delirium during their hospitalization using the Confusion Assessment Method in the intensive care unit. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent perioperative predictors of delirium after cardiac surgery. Statins were tested for a potential protective effect. Results: Of the 1,059 patients ana,11,zed, 122 patients (11.5%) had delirium at any time during their cardiovascular intensive care unit stay. Administration of statins had a protective effect, reducing the odds of delirium by 46%. Independent predictors risk of postoperative delirium included older age, preoperative depression, preoperative renal dysfunction, complex cardiac surgery, perioperative intraaortic balloon pump support, and massive blood transfusion. The model was reliable (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.3) and discriminative (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.77). Conclusions: Preoperative administration of statins is associated the reduced risk of postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据