4.6 Article

Expression Profile of Nerve Growth Factor after Muscle Incision in the Rat

期刊

ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 140-149

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190bc84

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Iowa
  2. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland [GM-55831, GM-067752]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R29GM055831, F32GM067752, R01GM055831] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that nerve growth factor (NGF) is an important mediator of pathologic pain. Many studies have focused on cutaneous mechanisms for NGF-induced hyperalgesia; few have examined its contribution in deeper tissues like muscle. This study examined pain behaviors and the expression of NGF in incised hind paw flexor digitorum brevis muscle. Methods: Adult Sprague-Dawley rats were pretreated with anti-NGF peptibody and underwent skin or skin plus deep fascia and muscle incision. Guarding pain behaviors were measured. Muscle NGF messenger RNA (mRNA) was measured by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Changes in NGF protein expression were measured using Western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunohistochemistry. In situ hybridization for NGF mRNA was also performed. Results: Pretreatment with anti-NGF peptibody (100 mg/kg) decreased the guarding behavior caused by deep fascia and muscle incision. Muscle NGF mRNA increased abruptly 2 h after incision and was the same as control by postoperative day 1. NGF protein increased from 4 h after incision and was sustained for several days. NGF was localized in many calcitonin gene-related peptide-positive axons, few N52-positive axons, but not isolectin B4-positive axons in incised muscle. The sources of NGF mRNA included keratinocytes in epidermis and fibroblasts; in deeper tissues. Conclusion: Fibroblasts adjacent to the injury are sources of NGF in incised muscle. NGF is upregulated by incision of muscle and contributes to guarding pain behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据