4.6 Article

Central Poststroke Pain: A Review of Pathophysiology and Treatment

期刊

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA
卷 108, 期 5, 页码 1645-1657

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31819d644c

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: Central poststroke pain (CPSP) is a disabling morbidity occurring in 8%-1.4% of patients with stroke. It is infrequently recognized and difficult to manage. OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the pathophysiology and treatment of CPSP. METHODS: We conducted a Medline search using the key words central post-stroke pain, post-stroke pain, CPSP and basic studies, CPSP and clinical features, CPSP and pharmacological treatment, CPSP and nonpharmacological treatment and CPSP and treatment guideline. The articles related to CPSP were categorized into clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment, and then systematically reviewed. RESULTS: Stroke along the spinothalamocortical pathway may result in CPSP after a variable period, usually after 1-2 mo. CPSP may be spontaneous or evoked, variable in intensity and quality. It tends to improve with time. CPSP is associated with mild motor symptoms with relative sparing of joint position and vibration sensations. The pathophysiology of CPSP is not well understood, but central disinhibition, imbalance of stimuli and central sensitization have been suggested. There are few class I and class II studies regarding its management. Amitriptyline and lamotrigine (class IIB) are recommended as first-line and mexiletine, fluvoxamine and gabapentin as second-line drugs. In pharmacoresistant patients, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and deep brain stimulation have been beneficial. CONCLUSIONS: CPSP patients present with diverse sensory symptoms and its pathophysiology is still poorly understood. Amitriptyline and lamotrigine are effective treatments. Further studies are needed to understand the pathophysiology and investigate newer therapeutic modalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据