4.8 Article

Rapid Survey of Four Asp Isomers in Disease-Related Proteins by LC-MS combined with Commercial Enzymes

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 1, 页码 561-568

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac504413e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25288075] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Until relatively recently, it was considered that d-amino acids were excluded from living systems except for the cell wall of microorganisms. However, d-aspartate residues have now been detected in long-lived proteins from various tissues of elderly humans. Formation of d-aspartate in proteins induces aggregation and loss of function, leading to age-related disorders such as cataracts and Alzheimer disease. A recent study used LC-MS to analyze isomers of Asp residues in proteins precisely without complex purification of the proteins. However, to identify the four Asp isomers (L alpha, L beta, D beta, and D alpha) on the chromatogram, it was necessary to synthesize reference peptides containing the four different Asp isomers as standards. Here, we describe a method for rapidly and comprehensively identifying Asp isomers in proteins using a combination of LC-MS and commercial enzymes without synthesizing reference peptides. The protein sample is treated with trypsin, trypsin plus Asp-N, trypsin plus PIMT, trypsin plus paenidase, and the resulting peptides are applied to LC-MS. Because Asp-N hydrolyzes peptide bonds on the N-terminus of only L alpha-Asp residues, it differentiates peptides containing L alpha-Asp from those containing the other three isomers. Similarly, PIMT recognizes only peptides containing L beta-Asp residues, and paenidase internally cleaves the C-terminus of da-Asp residues. This approach was successfully applied to the analysis of all tryptic peptides in aged lens. The comprehensive quantitative data of Asp isomer formation in age-related proteins obtained via this method might be used as biomarkers of age-related disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据