4.8 Article

Mass Spectrometry Imaging: An Expeditious and Powerful Technique for Fast in Situ Lignin Assessment in Eucalyptus

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 86, 期 7, 页码 3415-3419

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac500220r

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo [Fapesp-2008/58035-6]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq-Brazil)/National Institute for Science and Technology Diabetes and Obesity
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES-Brazil)
  4. CNPq

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant biomass has been suggested as an alternative to produce bioethanol. The recalcitrance of plant biomass to convert cellulose into simpler carbohydrates used in the fermentation process is partially due to lignin, but the standard methods used to analyze lignin composition frequently use toxic solvents and are laborious and time-consuming. MS imaging was used to study lignin in Eucalyptus, since this genus is the main source of cellulose in the world. Hand-cut sections of stems of two Eucalyptus species were covered with silica and directly analyzed by matrix-assisted laser sesorption ionization (MALDI)-imaging mass spectrometry (MS). Information available in the literature about soluble lignin subunits and structures were used to trace their distribution in the sections and using a software image a relative quantification could be made. Matrixes routinely used in MALDI-imaging analysis are not satisfactory to analyze plant material and were efficiently substituted by thin layer chromatography (TLC) grade silica. A total of 22 compounds were detected and relatively quantified. It was also possible to establish a proportion between syringyl and guaiacyl monolignols, characteristic for each species. Because of the simple way that samples are prepared, the MALDI-imaging approach presented here can replace, in routine analysis, complex and laborious MS methods in the study of lignin composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据