4.8 Article

Fabrication and Characterization of an All-Diamond Tubular Flow Microelectrode for Electroanalysis

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 83, 期 14, 页码 5804-5808

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac2010247

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC/BAE Systems
  2. EPSRC
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [200261/2008-8]
  4. Advantage West Midlands
  5. European Regional Development Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the first all-diamond hydrodynamic flow device for electroanalytical applications is described. Here alternate layers of intrinsic (insulating), conducting (heavily boron doped), and intrinsic polycrystalline diamond are grown to create a sandwich structure. By laser cutting a hole through the material, it is possible to produce a tubular flow ring electrode of a characteristic length defined by the thickness of the conducting layer (for these studies similar to 90 mu m). The inside of the tube can be polished to 17 +/- 10 nm surface roughness using a diamond impregnanted wire resulting in a coplanar, smooth, all-diamond surface. The steady-state limiting current versus volume flow rate characteristics for the one electron oxidation of FcTMA(+) are in agreement with those expected for laminar flow in a tubular electrode geometry. For dopamine detection, it is shown that the combination of the reduced fouling properties of boron doped diamond, coupled with the flow geometry design where the products of electrolysis are washed away downstream of the electrode, completely eradicates fouling during electrolysis. This paves the way for incorporation of this flow design into online electroanalytical detection systems. Finally, the all diamond tubular flow electrode system described here provides a platform for future developments including the development of ultrathin ring electrodes, multiple apertures for increased current response, and multiple, individually addressable ring electrodes incorporated into the same flow tube.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据