4.8 Article

Tandem mass spectrometry characteristics of silver-cationized polystyrenes: Backbone degradation via free radical chemistry

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 347-354

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac071071k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The [M + Ag](+) ions of polystyrene (PS) oligomers are formed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, and their fragmentation characteristics are determined by tandem mass spectrometry experiments in a quadrupole/ time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) of [M + Ag](+) starts with random homolytic C-C bond cleavages in the PS chain, which generate radical ions carrying either the initiating (a(n)(center dot), b(n)(center dot)) or the terminating (y(n)(center dot), Z(n)(center dot)) chain end and primary (a(n)(center dot),y(n)(center dot)) or benzylic (b(n)(center dot), z(n)(center dot)) radical centers. The fragments ultimately observed arise by consecutive, radical-induced dissociations. The primary radical ions mainly decompose by monomer evaporation and, to a lesser extent, by beta-H-center dot loss. The benzylic radical ions primarily decompose by 1,5-H rearrangement (backbiting) followed by beta C-C bond scissions; this pathway leads to either closed-shell fragments with CH2 end groups, internal fragments with 2-3 repeat units, or truncated benzylic b(n)(center dot)/z(n)(center dot) radical ions that can undergo anew backbiting. The same internal fragments are produced in all backbiting steps; hence, these fragments and small benzylic radical ions (which cannot undergo backbiting) dominate the low-mass region of the CAD spectra, while the less abundant closed-shell fragments with CH2 end groups (a(u)/y(n)) dominate the medium and high-mass regions. The latter fragments are suitable for determining the individual initiating and terminating end groups, whereas the internal ions could be valuable in sequence analyses of styrene copolymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据