4.8 Article

Chemometrics-Assisted Excitation-Emission Fluorescence Spectroscopy on Nylon Membranes. Simultaneous Determination of Benzo[a]pyrene and Dibenz[a,h]anthracene at Parts-Per-Trillion Levels in the Presence of the Remaining EPA PAH Priority Pollutants As Interferences

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 80, 期 21, 页码 8276-8286

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac801458a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  2. CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas)
  3. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PAE-22204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents a novel approach for the simultaneous ultratrace determination of benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, the two most carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), in a very interfering environment, combining the recently discovered ability of the nylon membrane to strongly retain and concentrate PAHs on its surface, the sensitivity of molecular fluorescence, and the selectivity of second-order chemometric algorithms. The fluorescence excitation-emission matrices, directly measured on a nylon-membrane surface, are processed by applying parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) and unfolded partial least-squares coupled to residual bilinearization (U-PLS/RBL). The superiority of U-PLS/RBL to quantify BaP and DBA at concentrations below 10 ng L-1 in the presence of the remaining 14 US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) PAHs at total concentrations ranging from 1400 and 14 000 ng L-1 is demonstrated. The present method successfully faces this complex challenge without using organic solvents, which are to known produce environmental contamination. Finally, the high sensitivity of the present method avoids preconcentration and elution steps, considerably decreasing the analysis time and the experimental errors. Because the instrumental involved in the determination is nonsophisticated, the experiments could be carried out in routine laboratories.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据