4.5 Article

A graphene screen-printed carbon electrode for real-time measurements of unoccupied active sites in a cellulase

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 447, 期 -, 页码 162-168

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2013.11.024

关键词

Cellulase kinetics; Hypocrea jecorina Cel7A; Cellobiohydrolase; Screen-printed carbon electrodes; Graphene; Nitrophenol

资金

  1. Danish Agency for Science, Technology, and Innovation
  2. Programme Commission on Sustainable Energy and Environment [2104-07-0028]
  3. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology in Japan [23760746]
  4. The Scandinavia-Japan Sasakawa Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23760746] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulases hydrolyze cellulose to soluble sugars and this process is utilized in sustainable industries based on lignocellulosic feedstock. Better analytical tools will be necessary to understand basic cellulase mechanisms, and hence deliver rational improvements of the industrial process. In this work we describe a new electrochemical approach to the quantification of the populations of enzyme that are respectively free in the aqueous bulk, adsorbed to the insoluble substrate with an unoccupied active site or threaded with the cellulose strand in the active tunnel. Distinction of these three states appears essential to the identification of the rate-limiting step. The method is based on disposable graphene-modified screen-printed carbon electrodes, and we show how the temporal development in the concentrations of the three enzyme forms can be derived from a combination of the electrochemical data and adsorption measurements. The approach was tested for the cellobiohydrolase Cel7A from Hypocrea jecorina acting on microcrystalline cellulose, and it was found that the threaded enzyme form dominates for this system while adsorbed enzyme with an unoccupied active site constitutes less than 5% of the population. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据