4.5 Article

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is a reliable internal control in Western blot analysis of leukocyte subpopulations from children

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 413, 期 1, 页码 24-29

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.01.037

关键词

beta-Actin; GAPDH; Internal control; Monocyte; Neonate; Western blot

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 98-2314-B-182A-004-MY3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Kaohsiung, Taiwan [CMRPG 860031, CZRPG 880253]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study differences in the development of immunity, leukocytes from cord blood are often compared with those from adult peripheral blood. Western blot analysis is a common method for detecting proteins. In this study, we investigated the reliability of using different housekeeping proteins (beta-actin, beta-tubulin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH]) as internal controls for different leukocyte subpopulations from infants, children, and adults. Our results showed that the expression levels of beta-actin and beta-tubulin were much lower in cord blood leukocytes than in adult leukocytes, and this expression pattern persisted in children up to 3 years old. Further study revealed that the beta-actin expression level in newborns was especially lower in CD14-positive monocytes. However, cord blood and adult peripheral blood monocytes had similar expression levels of beta-actin messenger RNA (mRNA). Further experiments showed that posttranslational regulation was responsible for the low beta-actin expression level in neonatal monocytes. Thus, researchers should carefully assess the appropriate use of housekeeping gene-encoded proteins as internal standards to normalize samples for comparisons of different leukocyte populations from subjects of different ages. In this study, we determined that GAPDH was a more reliable internal control than others in Western blot analysis for comparing the development of immunity among infants, children, and adults. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据