4.5 Article

Favorably orienting recombinant proteins to develop amperometric biosensors to diagnose Chagas' disease

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 408, 期 1, 页码 86-94

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.09.002

关键词

Molecule-directed attachment; Chagas' disease biosensor; American trypanosomiasis biosensor; Chimeric protein; Amperometric biosensor

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT)
  2. CONICET (Argentinean Research Council)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical immunoassays often display suitable sensitivity but some lack of specificity or vice versa. As a trade-off between specificity improvement and sensitivity loss, biosensors were designed to perform indirect immunoassays with amperometric detection using tailor-made chimeric receptors to react with the analyte, specific anti-Trypanosoma cruzi immunoglobulin G (IgG). Recombinant chimeras were designed to favor their oriented covalent attachment. This allows the chimeras to properly expose their epitopes, to efficiently capture the analyte, and to withstand severe chemical treatment to reuse the biosensors. By further binding the secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-human IgG, in the presence of the soluble mediator and the enzyme substrate, a current that increased with the analyte concentration was measured. Biosensors using the chimeric constructions showed 100% specificity with samples that had revealed false-positive results when using other bioreceptors. A protein bearing a poly-Lys chain and thioredoxin as directing elements displayed the highest signal-to-noise ratio (P < 0.05). The limit of detection was 62 ng ml(-1), which is eight times lower than that obtained with a currently used commercial Chagas enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Reusability of the biosensor was assessed. The signal was approximately 80% of the original one after performing 10 consecutive determinations. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据