4.7 Article

Distribution and quantification of irinotecan and its active metabolite SN-38 in colon cancer murine model systems using MALDI MSI

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 407, 期 8, 页码 2107-2116

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8237-2

关键词

Mass spectrometry; MALDI imaging; Drug monitoring/drug screening; Irinotecan; SN-38

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Research of the Federal Republic of Germany BMBF [01ZX1310B, 01IB10004E]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 824 TP Z2, WA 1656/3-1, HO 1258/3-1]
  3. Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen (TKP-Project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of small molecules is a key to assess the mechanism of drug action and evaluate treatment efficacy. The prodrug irinotecan (CPT-11) is widely used for chemotherapeutic treatment of colorectal cancer. CPT-11 requires conversion into its active metabolite SN-38 to exert the desired pharmacological effect. MALDI-Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) and MALDI-time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) were performed for detection of CPT-11 and SN-38 in tissue sections from mice post CPT-11 injection. In-depth information was gained about the distribution and quantity of drug compounds in normal and tumor tissue. The prodrug was metabolized, as proven by the detection of SN-38 in liver, kidney and digestive tract. In tumors from genetic mouse models for colorectal cancer (Apc (1638N/wt) x pvillin-Kras (V12G) ), CPT-11 was detected but not the active metabolite. In order to correlate drug distribution relative to vascularization, MALDI data were superimposed with CD31 (PECAM-1) immunohistochemistry. This analysis indicated that intratumoral access of CPT-11 mainly occurred by extravasation from microvessels. The present study exploits the power of MALDI MSI in drug analysis, and presents a novel approach to monitor drug distribution in relation to vessel functionality in preclinical and clinical research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据