4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of sample properties and mass spectroscopic parameters on electrospray ionization mass spectra of size-fractions from a soil humic acid

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 397, 期 7, 页码 3071-3078

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3884-4

关键词

Soft ionization mass spectrometry; FT-ICR-ESI-MS; Soil humic acid; Size-fractions; Size-exclusion chromatography; Cone voltage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Size-fractions from a soil humic acid were separated by preparative size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), desalted, and concentrated by ultrafiltration and vacuum centrifugation without being subjected to any freeze-drying process. After having assessed the lack of formation of any multiple-charged ions by high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS), the size-fractions were used by direct infusion to compare the molecular ion distribution by both atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI)- and ESI-MS in negative mode. The weight- (Mw) and number-averaged (Mn) molecular weight obtained by ESI-MS were invariably larger than by APCI-MS for all size-fractions, thereby indicating that ESI is more efficient than APCI to evaluate the molecular mass distribution of humic samples. No substantial difference was observed when concentration and pH of unfreeze-dried humic size-fractions were varied. The negative mode was applied to assess the effect of cone voltage from -20 to -60 V on ESI of the humic size-fractions further separated through an on-line SEC column. The resulting mass spectra and Mw and Mn values suggested that the variation of cone voltage in ESI-MS affects the ionization potential of associated humic molecules more in solution rather than their fragmentation. These findings agree with previous observations which indicated a limitation of ESI in providing consistent mass detection for a complex mixture of heterogeneous humic molecules, especially when they are aggregated by a freeze-drying process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据