4.7 Article

Optimization of extraction procedure and chromatographic separation of glyphosate, glufosinate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in soil

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 399, 期 4, 页码 1725-1732

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4468-z

关键词

Glyphosate and glufosinate herbicides; Extraction; Soil; FMOC derivatization

资金

  1. Agence De l'Environnement et de la Maitrise de l'Energie (ADEME)
  2. Conseil Regional de Franche-Comte
  3. RE.A.LI.SE network
  4. Alsace region
  5. network of CNRS, Evaluer et Reduire l'Impact de la Chimie sur l'Environnement (ERICHE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysing herbicides in soil is a complex issue that needs validation and optimization of existing methods. An extraction and analysis method was developed to assess concentrations of glyphosate, glufosinate and aminomethylphophonic acid (AMPA) in field soil samples. After testing extractions by accelerated solvent extraction and ultrasonic extraction, agitation was selected with the best recoveries. Water was preferred as solvent extraction because it resulted in a cleaner chromatogram with fewer impurities than was the case with alkaline solvents. Analysis was performed by FMOC pre-column derivatization followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on a 300 mm C-18 column which permitted enhanced separation and sensitivity than a 250 mm C-18 column and increased resistance than the NH2 column for soil samples. This extraction and analysis method allowing a minimum of steps before the injection in the HPLC with fluorescence detection is efficient and sensitive for a clay-loamy soil with detection limits of 103 mu g kg(-1) for glyphosate, 15 mu g kg(-1) for glufosinate and 16 mu g kg(-1) for AMPA in soil samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据