4.7 Review

A new SIMS paradigm for 2D and 3D molecular imaging of bio-systems

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 396, 期 1, 页码 85-104

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2986-3

关键词

SIMS; Imaging mass spectrometry; Depth profiling; 2D imaging; 3D imaging

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Life Sciences
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C008251/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the implementation of focused primary ion beams, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) has become a significant technique in the rapidly emerging field of mass spectral imaging in the biological sciences. Liquid metal ion guns (LMIG) offered the prospect of sub-100 nm spatial resolution, however this aspiration has yet to be reached for molecular imaging. This brief review shows that using LMIG the limitations of the static limit and low ionization probability will restrict useful imaging to around 2 mu m spatial resolution with high-yield molecules. The only prospect of going beyond this in the absence of factors of 100 increase in ionization probability is to use polyatomic ion beams such as C (60) (+) , for which bombardment induced damage is low. In these cases sub-micron imaging becomes possible, using voxels together with molecular depth profiling and 3D imaging. The discussion shows that conventional ToF-SIMS instrumentation then becomes a limitation in that the pulsed ion beam has a very low duty cycle which results in inordinately long analysis times, and pulsing the beam means that high-mass resolution and high spatial resolution are mutually incompatible. New instrumental configurations are described that allow the use of a dc ion beam and separate the mass spectrometry for the ion formation process. Early results from these instruments suggest that sub-micron analysis and imaging with high mass resolution and good ion yields are now realizable, although the low ion yield issue still needs to be solved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据