4.7 Article

Highly sensitive multianalyte immunochromatographic test strip for rapid chemiluminescent detection of ractopamine and salbutamol

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 839, 期 -, 页码 91-96

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.05.024

关键词

Lean meat agent; beta(2)-agonist; Multianalyte immunoassay; Chemiluminescence; Immunochromatographic test strip

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21175111]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Team in University of Chongqing
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing [CSTC2013jjB0096]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2013A025, XDJK2012A002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel immunochromatographic assay (ICA) was proposed for rapid and multiple assay of beta(2)-agonists, by utilizing ractopamine (RAC) and salbutamol (SAL) as the models. Owing to the introduction of chemiluminescent (CL) approach, the proposed protocol shows much higher sensitivity. In this work, the described ICA was based on a competitive format, and horseradish peroxidase-tagged antibodies were used as highly sensitive CL probes. Quantitative analysis of beta(2)-agonists was achieved by recording the CL signals of the probes captured on the two test zones of the nitrocellulose membrane. Under the optimum conditions, RAC and SAL could be detected within the linear ranges of 0.50-40 and 0.10-50 ng mL (1), with the detection limits of 0.20 and 0.040 ng mL (1) (S/N = 3), respectively. The whole process for multianalyte immunoassay of RAC and SAL can be completed within 20 min. Furthermore, the test strip was validated with spiked swine urine samples and the results showed that this method was reliable in measuring beta(2)-agonists in swine urine. This CL-based multianalyte test strip shows a series of advantages such as high sensitivity, ideal selectivity, simple manipulation, high assay efficiency and low cost. Thus, it opens up new pathway for rapid screening and field analysis, and shows a promising prospect in food safety. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据