4.7 Article

Rapid screening of multiple antibiotic residues in milk using disposable amperometric magnetosensors

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 820, 期 -, 页码 32-38

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.03.005

关键词

Cephalosporins; Sulfonamides; Tetracyclines; Magnetic beads; Milk; Screen-printed electrodes

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion Research Project [CTQ2012-34238]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid [S2009PPQ-1642]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disposable amperometric magnetosensors, involving a mixture of modified-magnetic beads (MBs), for the multiplex screening of cephalosporins (CPHs), sulfonamides (SAs) and tetracyclines (TCs) antibiotic residues in milk are reported for the first time in this work. The multiplexed detection relies on the use of a mixture of target specific modified magnetic beads (MBs) and application of direct competitive assays using horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled tracers. The amperometric responses measured at -0.20 V vs. the Ag pseudo-reference electrode of screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCE) upon the addition of H2O2 in the presence of hydroquinone (HQ) as redox mediator, were used to monitor the extent of the different affinity reactions. The developed methodology, involving a simple and short pretreatment, allowed discrimination between no contaminated UHT and raw milk samples and samples containing antibiotic residues at the maximum residue limits (MRIs). The usefulness of the multiplexed magnetosensor was demonstrated by analyzing spiked milk samples in only 5 min. The results demonstrated that a clear discrimination of milk samples contaminated with antibiotics at their MRL level or their mixtures, allowing the identification of milk not complying with current legislation. These features make the developed methodology a promising alternative in the development of user-friendly devices for on-site analysis to ensure quality control for dairy products. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据